Are you aware of the UK Waste Regulations update?  

The UK Waste (England and Wales) Regulations 2011 have been amended and the changes will enter into force on 1st January 2015. Here are more details to ensure you are up to date.

What has changed?

All businesses must ensure paper, metal, plastic and glass are collected separately. The amended regulations state that this new responsibility only applies where the act of separating these materials is necessary to ‘ensure, facilitate or improve recovery’, and where it is ‘Technically, Environmentally and Economically Practicable (TEEP)’ to do so.

What does this mean for you?

You will have to work with your waste service provider to ensure that they can separate those different strands of waste where reasonable and appropriate. Carbon Smart can work with you to determine the best way for you to do this.

The basics

  • You need to ensure glass is kept out of your mixed recycling stream.
  • If you produce lots of paper waste, you could add that as one of your separate waste streams.
  • Cans, tins and plastic packaging are fine to collect in one sack or bin, because this does not affect their ability to be recycled, further down the line.
  • Food and food contaminated waste will need to be kept separate.

Call Carbon Smart for advice on complying with this new regulation

Government commits to buying locally-sourced food to help cut waste  

In an attempt to reduce food waste, Prime Minister David Cameron announced that from 2017 all of central Government will commit to buying fresh, locally sourced, seasonal food: promising that “all food that can be bought locally will be bought locally”.

This will be done through a new, simplified food and drink buying standard: ‘The Plan for Public Procurement’. Public sector buyers will judge suppliers based on their environmental credentials and will look closely at the resource efficiency of food production, such as water and energy use and waste production and recycling. This makes it an exciting prospect for businesses that are focussed on minimising their environmental impact.

Not only will it directly benefit environmentally responsible businesses, according to Defra, it will further benefit rural economies and the British public. Defra has estimated that the standard will equate to around £200m of potential new business for British farmers.

Liz Truss, the recently appointed Environment Secretary stated that; “This move will mean that food served in canteens across the public sector can be more local, seasonal and tastier… it will help drive Britain’s first class food and drink industry and benefit the environment through reduced waste, higher take-up of meals and less unappetising food left on plates”.

In addition, the wider public sector will be encouraged and supported in using the new framework with the expectation that all schools and hospitals will, in future, serve more locally reared meats and freshly picked fruit and vegetables.

Less is more – international perspectives on office recycling  

Over the summer Carbon Smart has been working with a multi-national technology company, conducting waste audits at both their London and Zurich offices. Having analysed the waste management systems at these two different locations within the same company, it has been particularly interesting to observe the impact of national recycling policy and practices on office recycling rates.

Switzerland’s recycling policy focuses on the collection of aluminium cans and PET plastic bottles. These materials are all collected as separate streams, and within the office each material has its own designated bin. All other materials are collected as general waste and sent for incineration. In the UK on the other hand recyclables include, on top of those listed above, tetra packs and cardboard packaging, and up to 7 types of plastics, from yogurt pots to film wrapping. In the London offices these are all collected together as mixed recycling in one single bin and separated at a recycling plant.

Initially it seemed surprising that Switzerland – a country with such a good reputation for environmental management – only recycled a comparatively limited set of materials. However, once we dug deeper into the make-up of the waste, it became apparent that the Swiss strategy is actually very effective. While you might assume that being able to recycle a wider range of materials, and the convenience of just one bin for placing all recycling, would result in higher recycling rates and less contamination, in practice the opposite was true. In London the recycling and general waste were at times almost indistinguishable with considerable amounts of recyclable material going to incineration and considerable amounts of non-recyclable material contaminating the recycling. In Zurich, however, there was hardly any plastic or aluminium in the general waste, and virtually no contamination of the recycling streams at all.

While providing one bin for all recycling makes life easy, it can also be confusing with users of the scheme unclear about what is actually recyclable and what is not. Having a mixed recycling approach may also promote an attitude of indifference. Providing separate bins for each material as they do in Zurich, communicates the message that separation is important and places the responsibility for good recycling with the person doing the throwing away. Whereas with mixed recycling, because people know it will be sorted at a waste centre anyway, their part in the process is felt to be less significant and they may be more care less about what and where they throw their waste. In terms of designing both recycling policy and internal waste management systems it is great to be able to get these international perspectives and test our assumptions, as in practice with waste things are not always as you might expect.

manchestermet

Manchester Metropolitan University save £40,000 in procurement and disposal costs  

manchestermetThe Carbon Smart Manchester team has been working with WRAP to support Manchester Metropolitan University (MMU) in their shift towards more efficient resource use.

Carbon Smart have been working closely with the university’s facilities management department to identify the key opportunities for resource efficiency and the key barriers.

Office furniture was highlighted due to the high annual spend on new furniture. It was found that there was significant potential to improve resource efficiency through redeployment of furniture that is no longer needed in a particular area.

Since the completion of the resource optimisation review, in March 2013, MMU have implemented the main recommendation from the report – to develop an internal furniture reuse programme. It is anticipated that this project will divert a significant amount of the 30 tonnes per year of office furniture currently disposed offsite for internal reuse, with the programme predicted to save the University over £40,000 in procurement and disposal costs and around 90 tonnes of CO2e.

For further details please contact [email protected]